First, I'd like to mention my latest professional training. At the end of this past year, I had a 3 week webinar on professional social media management through Planet Ocean Communications – one of the best SEO businesses online. And I'm really excited at the prospect of now having the tools to help my clients achieve success with promoting their online professional presence.
From here on out, I intend to post at least twice a week (I expect my coach will remind me that I should be posting daily, but I'm going to start small and plan to increase my output) and pass my knowledge to you.
But back to making the major decision of having a professional do your website for you. What do you look for? How can you tell you are getting someone who truly knows what they are doing?
Back to the problem of WYSIWIG programs. It's easy to spot a site built with Frontpage as well as check out how much a webdesigner knows about SEO (search engine optimization), let alone HTML (Hyper Text Mark up Language = the code a good designer can write from scratch).
If your browser is Internet Explorer, look for “view” on your toolbar at the top of the screen on a webpage you'd like to investigate. Click on “view” and look for “source” as an option at the bottom of the drop down list. Click on that.
If you're using Mozilla Firefox, it's also labeled “view” and you want to look for “page source.”
For Safari, look for the second symbol in from the right at the top of the page. The first one on the right is a gear, the second one looks like a page with the top corner bent down. The page will say “display a menu for the current page” when you hover the cursor over it. Click on that and look near the bottom of the list for “view source” and click on that.
In Google Chrome, there's a button with a wrench on the right hand side at the top of the page. Click on the wrench (it says “customize and control Google chrome” when your cursor hovers over it), and look for the “Tools” option halfway down the dropdown menu. When you hover over “tools” yet another menu opens up and you want to select“view source” halfway down that page.
In the Opera browser, you have two options depending upon how your screen is currently set up. If the menu bar is visible, you will see the options starting at the top of the left hand side of the page – it says “file,” “edit,” and “view,” etc. If it's hidden, you'll see a bright red button at the top left hand corner with a big Opera “O” and the word “Menu.” Click on “Menu” and select “show menu bar” at the bottom of the list of options.
When the menu bar is open, you will see the “file,” “edit” and other options at the top left hand side of the window. Select “view” on this bar, and a new list of options drop down.
The last choice on the list is “developer tools.” When you hover over this, yet another list opens. Click on the first choice, “source.”
In all cases, you will have a new window (or tab) open up and you can see the code that a developer (or their software) has written for any given webpage. This is what a computer “reads” to show you what you see on your screen.
First of all, the code will tell you who or what generated it.
At the very top of the page,
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
Keep in mind that all of this code will be in brackets
meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"
If you don't see the !DOCTYPE code at the top of the page, chances are it was
created with software and not typed by a real person –
if so you will have -
meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0" (or some other type of software that automatically generated the content).
If it's actually been humanly created, in my case I always identify myself –
META name="author" content="Roberta Marley; ITP Webdesign"
META name="date" content="11/22/2010 6:13 PM ET"
meta name="distribution" content="national"
meta name="copyright" content="the name of the person who owns the site goes here"
meta name="Language" content="EN” (meaning English)
meta name="Robots" content="index,follow"
A good designer will always update the date and time stamp when they work on any given page. This will tip off the search engine robots that the page should be spidered (or “read”) again since there's new content there.
And if they've been properly trained, a designer will add additional meta tags for the search engines to aid in the indexing process – and not just this one tag -
meta name="Robots" content="index,follow"
But the tags that tell the search engines what's there that you'd like indexed -
META name="description" content="a few detailed but concise sentences about that page's content."
META name="keywords" content= “the most important words or terms that are actually used on that page. These should be the words or terms that someone will likely type into a search engine that would lead them to your page.”
Another time saving short cut that I myself have been guilty of (and I can promise that I no longer do) is repeating the meta tags for description and key words from one page in a site to the next. And ditto on the title tag – that is the tag that generates the title in the blue bar you see at the very top of every page. Very bad move for the simple reason that the search engine robots won't “read” and index all of the individual pages in the site. If the same description, key words and title appear from one page to the next, the robot will assume that the pages are all the same.
There are those individuals that will argue that meta tags are no longer that important with the search engines. But why, when they only take a few minutes to do, omit them? Especially when experience has shown me that using the same ones means the search engines will not index the individual pages in the site. For me, it's just a no-brainer. I do it because I want to be sure I'm doing everything I can to get my clients' sites indexed with the search engines.
There's something else you need to know that your developer is doing, and there's an easy way to find out if they are. Ask them if they know what a site map is and if they use them in their sites.
This is a trick question. There are two kinds of site maps and both are important. The obvious one is visible to site visitors. It's a single page in the site that gives text links to every page in the site. It's important for two reasons – first, if your site has a navigational toolbar that's is coded in javascript (or any other code other than basic HTML), there are some people running very old, outdated browsers that may not read these codes. If they can't get around on your website, they obviously aren't going to stay. Second, if someone is looking for a specific piece of information, and the terms used to index or link the pages in the site don't readily show them where they want to go (or not every single page is listed in your site index), it will save them considerable time if they can access a site map that lists and gives information about every page. Again, without a site map, there's another visitor who won't stay on your site.
The second type of site map is the one that's the vital one if you want your site to show up in Google's indexing. This type is all code and it's invisible to the average site visitor.
But you can access a website's site map if you know what you're looking for.
To look at my business site's site map, type in http://itpsites.com/sitemap.xsd into your browser or click on that link. This site map lists every page in the site that I want
Google's robots to index. It tells Google the most recent date that the content on any given page was changed or updated.
Not only is a site map of this type included on every website that I am maintaining, but I go into a section called webmaster tools on my business account at Google and inform them that the site index needs to be re-indexed every time I make changes or additions on a website. (And when I do these updates, I update the sitemap as well).
Another interesting detail that not every designer takes the time for is checking how a finished webpage looks at all the available screen sizes and on all the major browsers.
While the most popular size is 1024 x 768 (and chances are if you have a newer computer yours was automatically set at this size), the second most popular size is actually the smallest – 800 x 600. I not only have Internet Explorer loaded onto my computer, but I also have copies of Firefox, Safari, Opera and Google Chrome. While I prefer the smallest screen size, I check how any given webpage looks on all the major browsers and at all the possible screen sizes.
Why do I bother? Have you ever visited website where you couldn't see everything on the page in your screen? Were you forced to scroll back and forth with a bar at the bottom of the screen as well as the usual one on the side? It made viewing content a nightmare, didn't it? That's because the person (or software) responsible for designing the site did not do their homework. They didn't take the time to be sure that the site looked good in all the possible combinations of web browsers and screen sizes. It's the sign of a very unprofessional job. (Either that of they just don't have the time or aren't making the time to do some important detail work).
Why is this important? Well, think about it. If you were frustrated from trying to scroll around on the page or things weren't displaying properly, did you stay and look at the rest of this site? I would say no. That site lost a visitor. You went elsewhere.
These are just a few of the time consuming but important small details that I always attend to when I'm designing a client's webpages. Does your webdesigner do this? I certainly wouldn't want to pay for someone's services if they aren't taking the time to do this.
Next time – some important new statistics about why social media (that includes Facebook, Twitter and blogging), and using it properly, so very important if you want your business to succeed in the 21st century.
While development platforms are great for doing the job of creating your code, they are not always able to be relied on for classic text editing. When you use a platform, in theory it will provide workable code to produce the website features and appearance that you want. However, if you wish to ensure that the code is free of errors, and be directly involved in the process, utilizing a text editor is a better option.κατασκευή e-shop
ReplyDelete